Criminal Liability Of Ppat For Providing False Information In Authentic Deeds Study Of Decision Number 346/Pid.B/2022/Pn Kla

Main Article Content

Edi Agus Yanto

Abstract

This normative-juridical study analyzes the criminal liability of a Land Deed Official (PPAT) regarding the forgery of an authentic deed, based on Kalianda District Court Decision No. 346/Pid.B/2022/PN KLA. The central issue lies in the judge's ratio decidendi, which failed to apply the criminal sentencing enhancement for public officials (Article 58 of Law No. 1/2023) regarding the crime of document forgery (Article 444 paragraph 1 of Law No. 1/2023); consequently, the 2.5-year prison sentence failed to provide a deterrent effect or substantive justice for the victim of a land mafia scheme. It is recommended that the Supreme Court issue a Circular Letter establishing specific minimum sentencing guidelines for officials who abuse their authority, and that PPATs mandate biometric verification via the National Land Agency (BPN) application to prevent negligence.

Article Details

How to Cite
Agus Yanto, E. (2026). Criminal Liability Of Ppat For Providing False Information In Authentic Deeds: Study Of Decision Number 346/Pid.B/2022/Pn Kla. Lex Generalis Law Journal, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v7i7.3612
Section
Articles